Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:59

Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2 owners urged not to skip crucial step setting up their new consoles - GAMINGbible
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
My friend asked my crush and he said my crush hates me but not in a rude way. What does that mean?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
When did women stop wearing bonnets in North America?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Princess Peach's Voice Actor Has Been Replaced After 18 Years - Nintendo Life
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
A Cosmic Tech Mystery Results in Literal Lost Souls in This Sci-Fi Short Story - Gizmodo
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why do some straight men enjoy wearing women's lingerie?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.